Motorola's much anticipated Droid Turbo handset, the user manual of
which was purportedly leaked last week,
has once again shown up - this time in a leaked image on Twitter.
The
image tweeted by @DroidLanding shows the Droid Turbo's red-coloured
textured back panel featuring a camera and two LED flash modules on
either side just as expected, a design first introduced with the Moto X
(Gen 2). A Motorola logo in the centre and Verizon branding at the
bottom are also visible in the leaked image.
Also, as seen in the
leaked user manual (which didn't contain an image of the back panel)
previously, the Droid Turbo in the leaked image also features a power
button and two volume buttons on the right-side bezel.
The image
tweeted by @DroidLanding has now been deleted. However, Phonearena
managed to get its hands on the image.
Moreover,
the Motorola Droid
Turbo smartphone is also being tipped to feature a 3900mAh battery that
can be fully charged in 3 hours. The image of the battery showed
Motorola EQ40 printed on it, which is the same codename used when the
handset was approved by the FCC as per Phonearena.
The
Motorola Droid Turbo, as per its leaked user manual,
features a 5.2-inch display, a 21-megapixel rear camera with dual-LED
flash, and features like Moto Actions, Moto Display and Moto Connect.
Besides
4G LTE, the Droid Turbo also features
Bluetooth, NFC, Wi-Fi and GPS connectivity options. Qi wireless charging
compatibility is also mentioned as one of the features of the handset,
along with support for Motorola's Turbo Charger.
A
report from August claimed that Motorola is planning to debut 8 new
devices
before Christmas. However, out of 8, the company has now already
introduced Moto X (Gen 2) and Moto G (Gen 2) handsets.
The report
claims that the company is also planning to launch the Droid, the Droid
Maxx, the Droid Turbo, the Moto X Play, the Moto S and the
much-anticipated next Nexus smartphone codenamed 'Shamu' before the end
of the year.
Apart from launching the Galaxy Note 4 in India, Samsung also launched the Gear S 3G-enabled smartwatch that was unveiled
ahead of IFA 2014. The Gear S has been priced at Rs. 29,500 (MRP), and
Samsung estimates a market operating price of Rs. 28,900.
The Gear S
smartwatch is standalone in the sense that it allows users to make and
receive calls via 2G or 3G, unlike other smartwatches, and also offers
Bluetooth 4.1 and Wi-Fi connectivity. Samsung says the smartwatch will
always remain connected, and can also switch between multiple networks
to stay synchronised with the paired smartphone.
However, to be
precise, the Gear S smartwatch is not truly standalone, as it requires
one of 20 Samsung smartphones during initial setup, and to download
apps.
Running on the company's own Tizen
operating system, the Gear S now has a separate slot for a SIM card
(Nano-SIM) on the back panel along with the heart rate sensor and four
pogo pins. The
Gear S features a 2-inch curved Super AMOLED display with a 360x480
pixel resolution. A dual-core 1GHz processor with 512MB of RAM powers
the Samsung Gear S. It comes with 4GB of inbuilt storage and is backed
by a 300mAh Li-ion battery, rated to deliver 2 days of charge with
typical usage.
The IP67-certified dust and water resistant Gear S
shows notifications from text messages, social networks, calendars and
other applications independently without the need to access the
smartphone. Samsung is also touting S Voice functionality for dictating
and voice commands, apart from the onscreen keyboard.
Samsung has
included its own S Health app, apart from Nike+ Running, to help users
track their health statistics. Also onboard is turn-by-turn pedestrian
navigation provided via Here Maps, a 24-hour news service from the
Financial Times, and more. The device will be available in Black and
White colour variants.
"Samsung is leading this exciting and
rapidly developing wearable category through progressive innovation,"
said JK Shin, CEO and head of IT & mobile communication at Samsung
Electronics. "The Samsung Gear S redefines the idea of the smart
wearable and the culture of mobile communication. It will let consumers
live a truly connected life anywhere, anytime." Samsung,
along with Gear S, also launched the Gear Circle in India - priced at
Rs. 8,500. The Samsung Gear Circle is a Bluetooth 3.0-enabled in-ear
headset that clasps around the users' neck via a magnetic lock when not
in use. The headphone can be paired with the smartphone to make/ receive
calls, access music, and take S Voice and other voice commands from
users. To alert users for an incoming call, Gear Circle also comes with a
vibrating function. The device is backed by a 180mAh Li-ion battery
rated to deliver 300 hours of standby time, 11 hours of talk time and 9
hours of music play time.
Xiaomi has received great response from customers in India, and has been
making sales records online with the entire inventory of both the Mi 3
and Redmi 1S smartphones going out of stock within few seconds in each
flash sale on Flipkart.
Now Xiaomi's Vice President of International
Operations, Hugo Barra, has revealed in an interview
that the new Redmi Note can be expected to launch in India within the
next two months. He said, "A date is not decided yet. Hopefully we will
have devices ready to sell in the next two months."
On being
asked about the launch of Mi 4, Barra responded, "We don't have a date
for Mi 4 yet. I am going to stick with what I said earlier which is
still the plan -launch it late December 2014 or early January 2015. I
don't think the Redmi Note would conflict with Mi 4 even if we launch
them together."
Considering that Xiaomi is no longer selling its
former flagship in India, the Mi 3, the launch of the Mi 4 certainly
fits in with the company's strategy as it needs a flagship in its India
portfolio to make up.
Barra also confirmed that there will be no
further Mi 3 sales in India. He said, "No, we are done with the Mi 3."
However for Mi 3 fans, Barra revealed some good news - the company may
like it did with 25,000 smartphones on October 6, add the Mi 3
automatically to the carts of Flipkart users who were repeatedly
unsuccessful in their attempts to buy the popular phones during the
numerous flash sales.
"We always keep a few thousand units as a
precaution for replacements. However, once we are sure that we don't
need that stock for replacement any more, we may do something to what we
did on the 6th October for customers who did not get the Mi 3 even
after 5 attempts," he added.
Xiaomi is all set to offer 1,00,00
Redmi 1S units on the sixth flash sale units on October 14. Notably, the
sixth flash sale on Tuesday will kick off at 2pm IST on Flipkart for
registered users.
London: Scientists have developed a new app enabling users to operate their smartphone with gestures.
The app developed by Professor Otmar Hilliges and his
staff at ETH expands the range of potential interactions with such
devices and the gesture control significantly expands the range of
smartphone functionality.
The app lets the smartphone
understand gestures such as movement of your index finger to the left,
or right or spreading out of your fingers, or imitate a pair of pliers
or the firing of a pistol.
This gesturing wizardry is made
possible by a new type of algorithm that uses the smartphone's built-in
camera to register its environment and then executes the gesture
command associated with the gesture it observes.
The
program also recognizes the hand's distance from the camera and warns
the user when the hand is either too close or too far away and currently
recognizes six different gestures and executes their corresponding
commands.
The researchers are convinced that this new way
of operating smartphones greatly increases the range of interactivity.
The researcher's objective is to keep the gestures as simple as
possible, so that users can operate their smartphone effortlessly.
Human beings have long believed that it is our unique level of
intelligence that separates us from other animals. Our ability for
higher learning, creative thought, and – perhaps most importantly – our
sophisticated communication via speech and language, defines us as a
superior species. However, as we expand our understanding of how the
brain works, and use animal experiments to learn more about the genes
involved in intelligence, will we reach a point where we can pull other
species onto our intellectual plane?
The idea of enhancing animal
intelligence may not be as far-fetched as it sounds. Consider a study
published last month by Ann Graybiel and colleagues at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology about the relationship between intelligence and
genes. The team genetically engineered mice to produce the human form of FOXP2
– a gene known to be linked to the human brain's capacity to learn and
process speech – to see whether it would improve the rodents’ ability to
learn. Sure enough, when the boosted mice were made to navigate a maze
in order to get a reward of chocolate milk, they learned the route
faster than the mice without the added human gene.
The results are
exciting for anyone interested in understanding the genetic changes in
our prehistory that helped us become the wise – or “sapient” – ape. But
the nature of this study speaks to another question: whether through
fundamental alterations and improvements to mouse brains we could create
sentient animals with levels of intelligence to rival our own – a
concept known as “uplifting”.
In the past, uplifting has been explored mainly
in science fiction. One of this summer's biggest movies was Dawn of the
Planet of the Apes, which depicts a civilisation of intelligent primates
descended from test subjects altered by scientists hoping to find a
cure for Alzheimer's.
And yet the movie has parallels with real
research now under way. In 2011, a research team led by Sam Deadwyler of
Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, used five rhesus monkeys to study the factors that lead people with diseases like Alzheimer’s to lose control of their thought processes.
The researchers trained the monkeys in an intelligence task that
involved learning and identifying images and symbols. They were then
given doses of cocaine in order to dull their intelligence and made to
repeat the test, with predictably less impressive results.
What
happened in the next stage of the research was remarkable. The same
monkeys were fitted with neural prosthetics – brain implants designed to
monitor and correct the functions of the neurons disabled by the
cocaine. These implants successfully restored normal brain function to
the monkeys when they were drugged – but crucially, if they were
activated before the monkeys had been drugged, they improved the
primates’ performance beyond their original test results. The aim of the
experiments was to see whether neural prosthetics could theoretically
be used to restore decision-making in humans who have suffered trauma or
diseases such as Alzheimer's – but as far as these specific tests were
concerned at least, the brain prosthetics appeared to make the monkeys
smarter.
All this means we may have already entered the era of animal uplifting, says George Dvorsky of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies,
a think tank that focuses on the implications of future technology.
"But as for more substantive, impactful augmentations, that's still a
way off,” he says. “The kind of uplift that appears in science fiction
will require technologies far more advanced than anything we have
today.” This doesn’t mean we won’t eventually develop these
technologies, he adds, particularly as they will primarily help us use
animals to learn about cognitive problems in humans, including
neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's.
It’s an important
point: even if the idea of uplifting may seem fantastical – and not the
sort of goal we should be pursuing – the potential medical benefits in
terms of combating human disease and injury suggest further progress
down a path that leads to uplifting is inevitable. Certainly such
manipulation of animals has advanced enough to become a serious matter
to bio-ethicists: in 2011, the Academy of Medical Sciences in the UK
reported on the ethics of research involving animals containing human material, and devoted an entire section to brain and cognitive manipulation.
The
matter has also become a passionate debate for theorists. Some, like
Dvorsky, suggest that the debate should be pushed even further, beyond
considering just the medical and scientific advances. He believes in an
“ethical imperative to uplift”, arguing that if the technology is
developed it should be shared with animals in order to free them from
the anguish of 'survival of the fittest' as much as it is to free
humans: "As the stewards of this planet, it is our moral imperative to
not just remove ourselves from the Darwinian paradigm, but all the
creatures on Earth as well. Our journey to a post-biological,
post-Darwinian state will be a mutual one."
For David Brin, a science fiction author whose
novels helped popularise the concept of uplifting, the reasons to pursue
the idea are slightly more pragmatic. He hopes that newly intelligent
species would help us share the responsibility of protecting the
environment. "The oceans of planet Earth are a vast mystery, filled with
both physical wealth and unique treasures to preserve,” he says. “We
are trying to learn to be good planetary managers, but I doubt we could
fill that role all by ourselves, anywhere near as well as if sapient
dolphin partners (and critics) were by our side. The same holds for
countless other opportunities for both profit and wisdom."
For
others the whole idea is far more problematic. Paul Graham Raven, a
researcher at the University of Sheffield, believes the pro-uplifting
stance represents biological and scientific arrogance and a misguided
belief in human superiority over nature, where human intelligence is
viewed as the pinnacle of evolution.
This is perhaps the biggest
moral dilemma of the whole uplifting debate: even if Dvorsky, Brin, and
others believe granting intelligence to other species would be for their
benefit, Raven questions whether we possess the moral authority to make
that decision for them without their consent. "It assumes we know
what's best for species other than ourselves. Given we show little
evidence of knowing what's best for our own species, I'm inclined to
mistrust that assumption, however well intended," he says. If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on Future, head over to our Facebook or Google+ page, or message us on Twitter.
At a recent car boot sale in the UK, Mark Tilden stumbled on
something he often looks for at second-hand markets – one of his famous
creations. Tilden, formerly a roboticist the Los Alamos National
Laboratory, is a toy designer and he was now holding in his hands one of
the humanoid bots he invented for children, “Robosapien”. Delighted
with his find, he bought it for, “something like five quid”. The bot
would give him the perfect opportunity to see exactly how it had been
used.
“This toy had been played with to death. I was amazed,” he
says. “It was filled with sand, it was filled with Plasticine, it had
make-up still on it, rusted batteries – it had obviously been taken into
the bath-tub – and that was fascinating because all of a sudden you
realise that someone had loved this toy to the absolute extent.” Sure,
it had been up for sale, but this bot had a good life.
What was it
about this robot that had appealed so much to its owner? It’s a
question that Tilden and other roboticists think is important – not just
for toy design, but the future of robotics. For too long, robots have
suffered from an image problem. They are often perceived as mechanical, cold and threatening in our culture
and it’s difficult to reverse that impression. But this view of robots
could be changed if they were designed to appeal to us with the same
familiarity and, indeed, personality that our childhood toys once
possessed.
Children’s affection for Robosapien could be
explained by the bot’s ability to display these characteristics, argues
Tilden. His robot was never designed to seem super smart or unreasonably
clever, but to have foibles and quirks that would entertain children
and engage their imaginations. For instance, the toy’s 67 pre-programmed functions
include belching, rapping and dancing. Seeing the Robosapien as a pal
was far more important than seeing it as a hyperintelligent, futuristic
machine.
Could other successful toys provide similar cues for
robot designers? Perhaps – and it needn’t even be toy robots. Take
Cabbage Patch Kids, for example. A highly successful line of dolls,
Cabbage Patch Kids appealed to children’s emotional intuition through
their insistence on being taken seriously as infants that required love
and attention. They needed their nappies changing, as one advertisement explained,
and came with documentation like birth certificates and adoption papers
which positioned them within a mock bureaucratic world of parenting. As entertainment scholars have noted,
it was the emotional responsibilities of owning a Cabbage Patch doll
that made them persistent as toys – kids couldn’t put them down because
they had a duty to look after them, a duty which they understood
instinctively.
How do we get from here to robots? A few other
toys will help to explain. In the 1990s, the electronic sophistication
of toys was burgeoning and offered new opportunities to exploit
children’s empathetic instincts. Tamagotchis were small egg-shaped mini
computers with a square LCD screen displaying an animated pet.
The
onus was on the child to look after this pet by feeding and playing
with it. More than 76 million Tamagotchis have been sold worldwide since
their arrival in 1996. The phrase “Tamagotchi effect” was coined to describe the strong emotional attachment to virtual agents exhibited by Tamagotchi owners.
Newspaper reports at the time marvelled
at how children expressed extreme outpourings of grief when their
“cyberpet” finally succumbed to that great leveller of all, death.
Tamagotchis required children to carry out a duty of care, like Cabbage
Patch Kids, but the difference was that the consequences of bad
parenting would actually be played out.
The Furby, launched in the
1990s, was designed to evoke similar emotions. Furry, talkative and
exhaustingly needy, Furbies yearned for love and care. In this Radiolab podcast,
Furby co-creator Caleb Chung explains that Furbies were designed to
appeal to human beings’ innate sense of compassion by sounding scared
when held upside down, or by quivering at loud noises.
Quaint, you might think, and something that only small children would do. But consider the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan who gave funerals to combat robots when they were irreparably damaged. That machines provoke strong emotional connections with us is not the preserve of children.
All of this is now directly informing the work of
robot designers around the world. Aldebaran Robotics, headquartered in
Paris, has learned a lot from the world of toys.
“When we saw that
children were able to have a very strong connection with a Tamagotchi, a
very simple device, we knew that it would be possible to create a much
stronger connection with a robot that had a humanoid shape, an
expressive voice and expressive gestures,” explains Aldebaran’s research
director, Rodolphe Gelin. “Toys demonstrated to us that this was
possible.”
The company’s most famous bot is Nao – a humanoid robot used in educational settings.
Nao is intentionally the size of a teddy bear, says Gelin, so as not to
be too large and “invasive”. Nao also has LEDs around its eyes and on
the sides of its head that animate to provide further cues, such as
blinking, which suggest it is alive. Even simple things, like making
sure Nao didn’t have a lot of visible metallic parts, helped to
naturalise it.
Aldebaran has also crammed the robot full of
sensing capabilities which mean its behaviour can subtly adapt to the
needs of human companions. Cameras and image analysis can distinguish
your gender, or mood, for example, and 3D scanners read body language.
Studies
that explore how children interact with robots have shown that this
level of social intelligence is crucial for supporting long-term
relationships with machines. Lola Canamero, a researcher in adaptive
intelligent behaviour at the University of Hertfordshire, UK, agrees
that children are generally very willing to initially suspend their
disbelief when greeting a robot. However, that suspension of disbelief
may not last very long unless the variety of interactions can continue
to engage the child.
“If children see that the robot is actually
responding to what they do and not just performing random actions, that
keeps their interest for much longer and persuades them to continue
interacting with the robot,” she says.
The results of all these
efforts to improve the social capacities of robots speak for themselves.
For instance, Gelin recalls visiting a nursing home in France to ask if
the residents there, who had never seen Nao, would be interested in a
robot companion. The elderly people scoffed at the idea. Gelin told them
he of course understood – but before he left, he pulled Nao out of his
bag. The mood in the room transformed. Suddenly the nursing home
residents were fascinated and intrigued. “Can he sing? Can he talk to
me?” they asked.
It’s this eagerness for companionship that Gelin says robot manufacturers must now appeal.
“What
is most important for us is to have a robot which understands your
emotion and which can itself express emotion,” explains Gelin. “What one
generally imagines for a robot, that he will perform tasks, clean the
house, bring you a beer – for us these things will come later. The first
thing is to have robots which are accepted at home.”
After all,
when we were children, we had a special connection to our toys. They had
personalities, could follow us on adventures and proved to be the
ultimate companions. Perhaps the most promising robots of the future, then, will just be toys all grown up.
If you would like to comment on this article, or anything else you have seen on Future, head over to our Facebook or Google+ page, or message us on Twitter.
Why should I care about online security? It’s
tempting to assume that only big businesses or big celebrities have to
worry about their online security. After all, personal information like
our photographs aren’t as interesting to anonymous hackers as
compromising pictures of Jennifer Lawrence and other Hollywood A-listers, are they?
But
the truth is we all have photos and messages we would prefer to keep
private, and information like credit card details we would like to keep
safe. According to a report by security software-maker McAfee and the
Washington think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies,
more than 40 million people in the US
had their personal information stolen last year, as well as 54 million
in Turkey, 20 million in Korea, 16 million in Germany and more than 20
million in China.
While it would be a mistake to think that the
data we store online can ever be 100% safe, it would also be an error to
assume that we can’t make our email accounts and the data – including
photographs – that we store in the cloud a little bit more secure with
very little inconvenience.
I’m pretty sure I don’t store anything in the cloud, thanks… Many of the celebrities at the heart of the recent leaks may have thought the same.
But as cloud services grow it’s becoming common for devices like
smartphones to upload user data to remote servers by default. If you’re
at all worried about some of your photos falling into the hands of
malicious parties it’s probably not a bad idea to check your phone settings to see what data is being automatically backed up to the cloud, and disable automatic uploading.
Still, there’s no doubting that the cloud can be very useful
– ask anyone who has lost all their photos and contact information
because they lost or broke their phone. Fortunately there are other
actions you can take to keep your data in the cloud safe. Probably most
importantly, you’ll want to consider using a strong and secure password.
So what makes a good password? For starters, some computer security experts
say that password length is more important than complexity, which means
that a 16-character memorable password like “ilovemysportscar” is more
difficult to guess than an eight-character unmemorable password like
“T9$ey!!q”. This is because there are far more total possible
combinations of 16 characters than eight, meaning malicious software
must take longer to hunt through all the possible options to find the
correct password. One survey found that
22% of “strong” eight-character passwords that contained numbers and
symbols could be cracked after 10 billion guesses – compared with only
12% of 16 character passwords.
In his book How to Predict The Unpredictable, the
author William Poundstone proposes other tips, such as including
avoiding obvious number substitutions – most people substitute the
letter “I” with a “1”, for example, which creates a false sense of
security. Better would be to create a seemingly random string from the
first letters of a phrase you have memorised. (As an illustration, the
previous sentence in this paragraph could become:
“bwbtcasrsftfloapyhm”).
Alternatively, you might choose a random
string of letters and numbers, and use it to create a nonsense sentence.
So, the (admittedly too short) password “RPM8t4Ka”, explains
Poundstone, might become “Revolutions Per Minute, 8 track for Kathy”.
“I don’t know what it means,” he writes, “but I do know it’s fairly easy to remember.
OK, that’s my email password changed. Am I safe now? Not
completely. Even a 16-character password is useless if you
inadvertently hand it over to a hacker. Unfortunately, that’s all too
easily done. Use an unsecure wi-fi hotspot, for example, and an
eavesdropper on the same hotspot can easily monitor your internet
activity and read your passwords. If you’re not prompted to enter a password to access a wi-fi hotspot, there’s a good chance it isn’t secure.
It’s probably best to restrict your online activity to basic browsing
on these wi-fi hotspots, and perform more sensitive actions (checking
email, uploading data to the cloud) on your home wi-fi or using your
phone’s secure data network – look for the 3G or 4G symbol on your
screen.
You can actually go one step further for minimal extra fuss. Install a virtual private network (VPN) app on your phone,
switch it on when you’re on a wi-fi hotspot and it will essentially
make it more secure: the app scrambles all of the data from your online
activity – including the passwords you use to check email – in a way
that makes it unintelligible to eavesdroppers. VPNs aren’t free, though, so privacy comes with a price.
And that should protect me from data theft? It’s
a start – but you’ve still got work to do. We don’t know for sure how
hackers compromised the online accounts of the celebrities at the centre
of the recent leak. There’s some evidence that they exploited a vulnerability in Apple’s iCloud service
to repeatedly guess the user password until they found the correct one.
But there is another way to gain access to someone’s account, no matter
how strong their password is. If you know the person’s username, you
can ask the service provider to reset their password using the “forgot
my password” function. To work this particular trick a hacker needs to
know a little information about the person whose account they are trying
to access – things like their date of birth, their mother’s maiden
name, or the first school they attended – so they can guess the answers
to the security questions that must be answered to reset the password.
Of
course, celebrities will find it difficult to keep this kind of
personal information secret, which makes them particularly vulnerable to
this form of attack – Sarah Palin’s email account was hacked this way in 2011.
But many of us are all too willing to publish online the personal
information we rely on to protect our passwords – many of us display our
full date of birth on a social network profile, for instance.
Navigating the privacy settings on social networks to hide this data is often not easy,
but in the interests of keeping your data secure, it’s probably worth
taking the time to make sure this sensitive information is kept out of
sight of potential fraudsters.
Some people even advocate using false information on social networks – like an incorrect date of birth or ‘un-birthday’ – to keep your identity elsewhere secure.
OK, I’ve done all that. Am I finally safe? Sadly,
probably not. But you’ve certainly made life more difficult for
hackers. And there’s one final trick you can use to add an extra layer
of security. Many email and cloud services now offer two-factor authentication.
With this service enabled, simply entering your correct password on a
website won’t immediately offer you access to your account – instead it
might trigger an automated call or text message to your mobile phone
that requires you to punch in a PIN to complete the sign-in process. The
idea is that confirming your identity twice is more secure than making
you confirm it just once.
So I have to memorise, or do, yet another thing, then? As
with almost all of these security measures, two-factor authentication
adds a little bit of inconvenience every time you want to access your
account. Not everyone is prepared to trade convenience for security. But the bottom line is that we each have to make a personal decision about just how seriously we value our online privacy.
Is my personal information ever going to be more secure? As The Economist noted earlier this year
“Securing cyberspace is hard because the architecture of the internet
was designed to promote connectivity, not security.” And this will get
harder over the next few years and decades, as the “internet of things”
begins to flourish – where billions of devices, from cars to household
appliances to medical equipment, will be connected to the web.
“The
tactic of pumping out new software as fast as possible and then issuing
patches later to fix flaws in the code may be tolerable if all that is
lost is data, but if it involves personal safety, consumers will be less
tolerant,” noted The Economist. And if we want companies to be more
proactive in keeping our information safe, then it’s all the more reason
why we need to make sure we take enough precautionary steps ourselves.
To find out more about online security, check out at the World-Changing Ideas Summit in New York on 21 October. BBC Future will be covering the event in full – so watch this space.
(Reuters)
- Hundreds of alleged usernames and passwords for online
document-sharing site Dropbox were published on Monday on Pastebin, an
anonymous information-sharing website.
The anonymous user,
who claims to have hacked close to 7 million accounts, is calling for
Bitcoin donations to fund the operation.
"We
will keep releasing more to the public as donations come in, show your
support," the anonymous Pastebin user said on the site.
Dropbox, however, said it has not been hacked.
"These
usernames and passwords were unfortunately stolen from other services
and used in attempts to log in to Dropbox accounts. We'd previously
detected these attacks and the vast majority of the passwords posted
have been expired for some time now. All other remaining passwords have
been expired as well," a Dropbox spokesman said in an email to Reuters.
Dropbox
is a Silicon Valley startup that has proved a hit with consumers and
boasts more than 200 million users six years after it was started. It
has undergone tremendous growth amid the meteoric rise of cloud, which
is expected to continue booming alongside mobile computing.
NSA
whistleblower Edward Snowden last week advised those concerned about
their privacy to "get rid of Dropbox" and cease using Facebook (FB.O) and Google (GOOGL.O).
(Reporting by Supriya Kurane in Bangalore; Editing by Gopakumar Warrier)
BANGALORE:
India's biggest e-commerce company Flipkart has doubled its demand for
office space to 3 million sq ft, barely two months after approaching top
developers to lease 1.5 million sq ft. Embassy Office Parks, the equal
joint venture between Blackstone and Embassy Group, is said to bag this
lease deal which is pegged to be the largest office space transaction in
India in at least a decade.
The deal, at Rs 52 per sq ft, is
likely to be inked as early as this week. Flipkart plans to absorb the
entire office space in two phases, but in a record four to five years.
The e-commerce poster boy had short-listed Bangalore-based Bagmane Group
and Embassy in a process advised by real estate consulting firm JLL.
Senior officials at Embassy Office Parks declined comment.
Flipkart, which is sitting on about $1.5 billion in cash, has already
said that by the end of this financial year its employee strength would
be increased to 25,000 from 12,000 at the beginning of the year. In real
estate parlance, 3-million sq ft of office space could seat around
30,000 to 50,000 employees.
The breakneck growth of India's
e-commerce market and Flipkart's aggression at the top would mean that
hiring is likely to remain robust for the seven year-old-company
co-founded by Sachin and Binny Bansal.
Rival Amazon has already
leased out around 300,000 sq ft of office space at the World Trade
Centre in Bangalore, a tenth of the office space requirement that
Flipkart is projecting.
The office deal with Embassy Office
Parks will see Flipkart being housed in the 106-acre Embassy
TechVillage, which has around 500,000 sq ft of space that is yet to be
leased of the 1.9 million sq ft developed, with the potential for to
develop an additional 10 million sq ft of office space.
So far
India's e-commerce leased about 600,000 sq ft space in the first of the
ongoing calendar, said a report by consultancy firm CBRE South Asia,
adding that office space deals by the well funded startups were rising.
Sectoral experts said that India's real estate sector will gain from
e-commerce. CBRE South Asia deputy MD Ram Chandnani said e-commerce will
stimulate demand for warehousing/logistics space for building back-end
infrastructure, more than commercial office space.
MUMBAI: The Enforcement Directorate is looking to slap a show-cause
notice on e-commerce major Flipkart over alleged FEMA violation, a
report by ET Now said on Thursday evening.
The channel quoted
sources as saying, "Our investigation is over and our Bangalore team has
found evidence of FEMA violation against Flipkart." According to the
report, the e-tailer may face a penalty of over Rs 1,000 crore.
A source who refused to be identified said Flipkart had violated FEMA
provisions as WS Retail, the holding company, had investments from
companies overseas.
Apple's pretty much annual October new product
media event usually is preceded by a cute invitation sent to
journalists. The invitation typically includes a phrase or graphic
element that provides a vague clue to the secret agenda of the event.
Presumably, this is to drum up excitement and speculation, in
addition to creating an ah-ha moment when the audience understands the
connection between the invitation and the actual announcement.
This year, Apple's hint is this: "It's been way too long." That is the worst teaser I've ever heard.
What Haven't You Been Doing Lately?
Consider the phrase: It's been way too long since... what? Since we've
seen you last? Since we partied like there was no tomorrow? Nah. In
Apple Land, the connotation immediately turns to products and product
announcements.
Which then naturally turns to this: Which product hasn't been updated
in "way too long?" Which product has been neglected? Which product is
in desperate need of a makeover?
I don't consider myself a glass-half-empty kind of guy, but I found
myself immediately considering the products that Apple has been futzing
around with when I saw the teaser invite. Turns out, there are plenty of
Apple products that seem stale.
The MacBook Air, which has sported the same basic form factor since
Steve Jobs introduced it in 2008, comes to mind. Apple added the even
smaller 11-incher in October of 2010 -- four years ago. Sure, there've
been some minor upgrades along the way, but it's been four years -- and
not even a color refresh.
What's worse, the MacBook Air hasn't had a Retina display. The
MacBook Pro with Retina display came out two years ago in October of
2012. Is that way too long? Maybe. It sure feels like it -- but hey,
that's not Apple's fault, right? You just can't power a Retina display
with a battery in a super light MacBook Air form factor. Laws of physics
and whatnot.
The technical challenges aren't the point here -- nor is the waiting
game for Intel's next-generation Broadwell processors, which are well
suited to being crammed into a shrinking form factor.
There are rumors that Apple is working on a 12-inch Retina-based
MacBook Air variant, which it could even offer in Gold, Silver and Space
Gray colors, but the point remains: It's been way too long gives the speculation a negative spin, as if Apple has been neglecting a product rather than working feverishly on it and giving it the attention it deserves.
Which Other Products Have Stagnated?
See how easy it is to consider Apple's invite phrase in a negative
light? I just used the word "stagnated," which isn't a word you want
associated with your products -- like say, the Mac mini, which has been
largely ignored for two years. Or the iMac, which has gotten some
touchups here and there, but no Retina displays.
Odds are, Apple will update the iMac with a Retina display sometime
soon -- but now? Maybe. Neither product gets enough consumer attention
to justify being the subject of Apple's teaser, though.
There is only one product that clearly stands out here, and it's the
long-neglected Apple TV. The last hardware update was in March of 2012.
There have been lots of minor additions and updates to the software, but
the ingenuity and power of the hardware itself? For fans of the living
room couch, it's been languishing in obscurity. Finally. That is the first impression that Apple calls up with "It's been way too long."
That's really sad, because in reality, I'm excited and optimistic
that Apple will -- finally -- make a serious push into the living room
with a more powerful Apple TV and a much-improved content experience.
The phrase, "It's been way too long," could be applied to the way we
watch and consume television. It's been way too long since consumers had
a really great new way to watch TV. For anyone who pays attention to
their budgets and how they spend on entertainment, it's hard to find any
reason to be pleased with the bundles offered by our cable and
satellite TV services.
So, even though the teaser could be the harbinger of a brand new
world of awesomeness, the initial effort to understand it just results
in a negative spin for Apple.
Playing Catch-Up
Instead of excitedly speculating on how Apple might make the living room
"more comfortable than ever" with a new Apple TV that is now a hub for
HomeKit and a whole new world of home automation products, Apple sparked
people to wonder if it's been too long for an important new leap for
the iPad.
Is a thinner iPad offered in a Gold color with a Touch ID button
particularly cool? It doesn't take a genius to imagine a thinner iPad
Air or a new coat of paint.
Instead of being excited about how well the Apple ecosystem will
seamlessly let you hand off content, notifications, and messages between
Macs and iOS devices, the question turns toward a grouchy "it's about
damn time my Mac could talk with my iPhone."
The problem is that "way too long" implies an admission of failure --
and it's a failure on Apple's part, because this is Apple's event,
after all. Even if the company is saying it's way too long for some
other thing going on in the industry, the phrase boomerangs back to
Apple.
So what would be more successful?
Apple could have said, "better than ever," or "like you've never seen
before" or slapped on an image that implies a natural transformation
into something mature and cool, like the hint of a butterfly's wing in
the background of the invitation. Apple never would have to explain a
butterfly.
"Way too long" fails to suggest that Apple might have invented
something new -- or even created an upgrade leap. It suggests that Apple
finally caught up to a widely held expectation. I'm pretty sure that's
not what Apple was going for.
So yeah -- Apple's worst teaser ever.
Cylon is a classic Linux distro preconfigured with lots of tweaks -- kind of a Unity-less Ubuntu with bling.
Cylon runs the classic GNOME 3 desktop on almost any hardware
configuration made since 2007, but it is more suited to seasoned Linux
users. Newcomers to Linux may not make an easy transition.
Still, Cylon Linux is highly usable out of the box. With its
installed software, there's little need for supplemental installations.
The user experience, however, might be less than appealing for those who
are not at home with the GNOME 3 desktop.
I was impressed with Cylon's speed and dazzling animations -- but
once the eye candy novelty wore off, I went to the Compiz setting panel
to tone down the fireworks.
The classic GNOME 3 desktop is not for everyone. While Cylon's
developers did a clever job of tweaking the performance, they failed to
make it easy to change default settings for accessing virtual desktops.
Cylon also suffers from a common problem with GNOME 3 desktop
environments: It has too many separate settings panels for
Administration, System Compiz and Preferences.
Family Ties
Cylon Linux was last updated December 6th, 2012. Due to its lineage from
Ubuntu, this version is supported with system updates through 2017. Its
current version is 12.04.1 and is based on a kindred connection to
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. Its partial rolling update approach keeps pace with
the Ubuntu system updates.
Cylon is a relative newcomer and has a much different look and feel
despite its obvious reliance on direct Ubuntu branding. Cylon was
founded in November 2012.
Under Cylon's Hood
Cylon Linux relies heavily on its Ubuntu underpinnings, but its
closeness to Ubuntu is not readily apparent when you start using it.
This distro has a unique appearance. It looks and works nothing like the myriad of other Ubuntu derivatives.
Of course, the Software Center and the Update Manager carry the
Ubuntu names and are the same repositories. Even the System Settings
panel is strikingly similar.
Look and Feel
At first blush, Cylon's desktop appearance is like numerous other
carbon-copy Linux distributions -- but the similarity ends once you get
beyond the GNOME 3 panel at the top and the Docky bar at the bottom of
the screen.
The big difference appears as a flash in the pan once you start
clicking around the menu. It is a skimpy menu, by the way. It consists
of a single column organized by category. The contents of each category
slide out from the right as you hover over each label.
Expect to spend considerable time scrolling lists of submenus. The
main menu lacks any search window. Also, it lacks any favorites panel.
The default desktop view in Cylon Linux
includes preinstalled Conky clocks and screenlets plus a Docky Bar on
the bottom and a disappointing panel at the top of the screen.
That may be why developers preinstalled the Synapse search and launch
tool. The launcher is hardwired to the top panel. You also can access
this app by setting a keyboard combination.
Flash Bang
Click on a menu item or touch any category with the mouse pointer, and
the flashiness begins. The default visual effect is for a flash of
flames that blaze for a fraction of a second and then fade away.
Programs open with their windows upside down and then spinning right
side up. By default, the window controls -- maximize, minimize and X --
are in the left corner, just like Ubuntu.
Users familiar with Compiz effects will appreciate how Cylon has the
CompizConfig Settings Manager installed and activated. Seasoned Linux
users also will be able to change the settings as desired. However,
strangers to Linux easily could be intimidated by all of the options.
It is perhaps the combination of the Docky Bar and the brash Compiz
effects that set Cylon ahead of other Ubuntu Linux offspring. The level
of Compiz settings resembles much of the inherent interface chaos some
Linux users experience with the KDE desktop.
Panel Woes
The classic GNOME panel leaves a lot to be desired. Open programs are
highlighted on the Docky bar. A few launchers for system tools are
anchored to the top panel. But GNOME 3 does not give users any
configuration access to this locked-down panel.
Other than displaying a few expected notification icons along with
the application and places menus, the panel lets users do little with
the wasted space.
Not having the upper panel serve as an anchoring point for
personalized applets and pinned favorite programs is a sore point for
many Linux users disgruntled with the GNOME 3 interface. Cylon's use of
GNOME 3 does little to assuage that design dysfunction.
Cubed Delight
The spinning cube is without a doubt one of the most attractive visual
effects associated with using virtual workspaces in Linux. The
CompizConfig settings gives Cylon users a huge variety of options for
tweaking how the cube performs. Basic cube functionality is
preconfigured in this distro.
Hold the left CNTRL + ALT keys down while you press the left or right arrows. This changes the screen view to the spinning cube.
Hold the arrow key down to watch a perpetual spinning cube. Or press
the arrow key more deliberately to move among the virtual workspaces.
Missing in Action
As mentioned earlier, one of my main disappointments with Cylon's design
is the way it handles access to virtual workspaces. Most GNOME 3
desktops have a hidden thumbnail view that slides in from screen right
when touched by the mouse pointer to show activated virtual workspaces.
Clicking on a thumbnail gives you full-screen access to that virtual
location.
If that feature exists in Cylon Linux, it is a well-kept secret. The
feature is not activated by default. I could not find any system setting
for it.
Also missing is any setting for the number of virtual workspaces you
want to use. I am normally very good at finding such hidden triggers.
The fact that I can not find it strongly suggests to me that the feature
does not exist rather than is just well hidden.
No Way Out
Either way, this is a major design flaw in Cylon's implementation of the
GNOME 3 interface. I was able to send a program window to any of four
work spaces by right-clicking on the top border of the application
window. This feature exists in most Linux desktop flavors.
However, the lack of the standard access to those virtual spaces for
me is a disconnect and a deal breaker. The design fails on several
levels.
First, it is awkward to have to find the program icon resting
somewhere on the Docky bar and then click on it to swing onto that
virtual workspace. Second, it is distracting to have to move fingers off
the typing rows to press the three-key combination requiring two hands
to spin the cube to the appropriate workspace. Three is the lack of
configurable shortcut keys to move among virtual workspaces.
The Ubuntu distro -- and its various alternative desktops -- have
these features. So do other Ubuntu-based distros such as Linux Mint.
Yes, Good Exists
Those design flaws aside, Cylon Linux offers numerous features to make
it worthy of consideration. Perhaps one of the most impressive features
is the well-stocked installed software.
Most menu categories are stuffed with a dozen or more applications.
In many cases, the list includes four or five options for the same types
of programs. In nearly all cases, users will have little or no need to
go to the Software manager to find more titles.
What Cylon lacks in panel applets it makes up for with its ample
inventory of Screenlets. Finding and installing what you want is fast
and easy.
Cylon Linux is loaded with screenlet options and lots of doodads with a nice gallery of background images.
YPPA is a handy application that makes it very easy to add and manage
PPAs, or Personal Package Archives. This tool automates the process and
requires just clicking and selecting options.
Bottom Line
If you fancy the solid Ubuntu infrastructure but want something a lot
different in user experience, give Cylon Linux a try. The visual effects
are impressive and the system is preconfigured to work as installed.
Cylon Linux has a curved Expo View feature that is eye-catching.
However, do not expect Cylon Linux to be a Windows XP substitute. It
is intended for use by Linux users who have a liking for more
traditional GNOME 3 functionality.
Welcome, friends, to another installment of Gadget
Dreams and Nightmares, a trip through the land of delightful and
deplorable gizmos.
Among the items to grab my eye this week are portable chargers and
espresso makers, a robot hack, a limited-function radio, and a
bizarre-looking camera.
Ratings denote how interested I am in using each item, and are not an
indicator of quality or how strongly I recommend you spend money on
them. (An early tip: Don't buy the radio thing.)
HTC RE Camera
HTC is stepping so far out of the box with the RE Camera (pictured
above), it's almost as if there was never a box to begin with.
Instead of making us stare through a viewfinder, this minimalist
device almost demands a return to older forms of photography, while
still taking advantage of modern technology.
It looks like a cross between a periscope and an asthma inhaler,
neither of which scream style to anyone who might spot it in your hand. A
Lytro this is not.
There are some positives, since it can capture 16-megapixel still
images and 1080p video while wirelessly transferring the content to a
smartphone. It's likely to be more comfortable to use for extended
periods of time than holding up increasingly larger smartphones to
capture, say, a child's school play performance.
Meanwhile, if one absolutely needs to capture something quickly --
for instance, if a crime is taking place -- the RE Camera might let one
snap photos or start filming more quickly and inconspicuously than a
smartphone would.
Yet I don't really see this taking off. It can't be easier to use
this than to whip out a smartphone and take a quick picture. There's a
companion app that can act as a viewfinder, but that seems somewhat
redundant when at that point you could take a photo with your phone.
It's a poorly timed move, as well, since GoPro just unleashed a range
of new cameras, starting at $130. Shelling out $200 for a simple camera
that aims to keep smartphones in one's pocket seems superfluous. Then
again, if it stops people from taking photos with their tablets, it
might not be such a bad idea.
Rating: 2 Out of 5 Spy Submarines
Pronto Fast-Charge Battery
Carting a two-year-old smartphone around means it's increasingly
unlikely the battery charge lasts a full day. I often have to resort to
Airplane Mode to make sure I can get through an afternoon away from home
and still be reachable in case of emergencies.
It's probably time I picked up an external charger, and the fast-charging Pronto looks like a great option.
IBM is massively increasing its commitment to
Watson, which was evident at last week's IBM Think Forum. IBM recognizes
that if it can get a product that thinks first, then it can again take
absolute control over the technology market, and every other company
will be chasing it again.
It is making some impressive headway, and I agree that the firm that
succeeds at this will not only massively change the technology market,
but also change the world. The very real outcome is that many of us will
find our skills have become redundant -- and when I say "many of us," I
include analysts, because we are obviously at risk.
I'll close with my product of the week: Gorilla Glass, which is
what's keeping us from having far more broken phone screens and likely
helping Apple to avoid having to recall the iPhone 6 (though I still
think it should).
The Wonder of Watson
Watson is a fascinating system. I'm referring to this class of systems
as "decision engines," because they aim to help people make better
decisions. What makes them different from any other tool is that they
learn about you, rather than you having to learn as much about them.
Granted, with these early versions, it is kind of a shared experience
-- but prior to systems like Watson, all of the effort to learn how to
interface was on the user side. With Watson, the end goal is to shift
virtually all of this burden to the system.
What this means is that in the near-term future, when you need
something from Watson, you'll be able to sit down and immediately be
productive rather than spend the weeks to months it typically now takes
to learn a new system. Because Watson learns from you, the longer you
work with it, the better it becomes.
As more and more Watson computers are deployed, they learn from each
other creating sort of a digital Gestalt providing a massive
acceleration in the learning process.
Near-Term Expectations
There were a number of examples at the Think Forum of working systems
and prototypes that showcased what Watson can do today. For instance, a
hospital treating a cancer patient can look at the detailed information
captured on the patient and then determine the highest-probability path
to wellness. Watson already has information on obscure treatments and
illnesses, which it can apply to the solution.
The end result is a customized program that is developed from
information gathered all over the world -- both preventing mistakes that
already have been made and identifying little known successes to reach
an optimal solution.
Watson could provide travelers with an experience similar to what
travel agents once provided. For instance, if your plane were delayed
or grounded, it would automatically find and recommend an alternate
route while you were in transit, which you could execute with one
Amazon-like click. When called upon to help plan a trip, Watson could
apply what it knows about you and about the various airlines and hotels
to create the itinerary most likely to make it trip the best you've ever
had.
For help desk issues, it would take customers through custom decision
trees defined by the system's ability to diagnose the problem remotely
and gauge the technical capability of the caller. That would enable it
to provide the fastest resolution for the lowest cost, optimizing on a
blend of customer satisfaction and cost containment.
It automatically would identify and report bad trends to decision
makers, along with optimized recommendations, both to resolve the core
issues in a timely way and optimally reduce the related costs.
Company after company testified at the Think Forum that they were
seeing massive increases in customer satisfaction and getting a far
better handle on costs from Watson-type technology, which is still in
its infancy.
Jobs at Risk
Now with the next range of technology advancements, there are a ton of
jobs at risk -- and not the obvious ones, either. Specialists are pretty
safe for a while, but folks who provide general services -- like
accountants, tellers, bankers, stock traders and, well, analysts -- are
kind of screwed in the long term.
Fortunately, this won't happen overnight, and in the near term there
will be some great jobs training systems like Watson but, once trained,
these systems will be able to train each other almost instantly.
It will be even longer before specialists are at risk, because the
costs of training a system like Watson to handle a specialty will likely
exceed the benefits for some time. If the specialty is unique, that
time could be indefinite.
Wrapping Up: The Future
The Think Forum wrapped up with a look into the future, and it was a
fascinating discussion. Watson is kind of a left brain decision engine.
It is very strong numerically, but it is kind of an extreme version of
Sheldon on The Big Bang Theory. It isn't very empathetic, and it isn't intuitive.
Efforts like neural networking and cognitive computing will close the
gaps, resulting in machines that can do more than suggest the top
choices in a decision. They will actually make the decision, moving to
the next stage and doing the whole job. Fortunately, this right brain
aspect is still years off, and until it is ready, people will fill that
role.
Two clear job growth areas, for now and in the near term, will be
trainers for systems like Watson -- people who understand both a
particular subject area and how best to present it to Watson. They will
be Watson's right brain partners.
Product of the Week: Gorilla Glass
I was on Fox Business News this week covering the pain of a broken
smartphone screen. Toward the end of the show, we tried to break a
phone on air, but the phones bounced and didn't break. That was largely
because the phones used Gorilla Glass, which is broadly used on
smartphones today. It isn't invulnerable -- phones that use it still
break -- but they break far less frequently, and as we so humorously
demonstrated, it often takes a real boneheaded move to break one.
There was a lot of speculation that the iPhone 6 was going to use
sapphire glass, and that would have ended badly. That's because for some
screwy reason -- likely to save money -- Tim Cook allowed the iPhone 6
to have an aluminum frame rather than the steel or magnesium alloy frame
that other large phones use, and that makes the screen the stiffest
part of the phone.
Gorilla Glass bends a little, which is why you have a lot of bent iPhone 6s that don't have cracked screens as well.
Corning's Gorilla Glass
Sapphire doesn't bend at all, and though you'd likely have fewer bent
phones, you'd have a far higher number of even more expensive cracked
screens.
Much like jewels, if you do get a nick in the screen with sapphire,
that becomes a flaw -- and the screen will break on that flaw. So
sapphire would have cost more and not held up well at all on a large
phone.
Now, if phone makers would just work a little harder on protecting
the screens, we likely could eliminate most of the breaks that occur
when the phone lands on its corner on something as unforgiving as cement
or tile. However, Corning's Gorilla Glass is why far more of us don't
have smashed phones, and it turned my spot on Fox Business into a comedy
sketch, so it is my product of the week.
If you're looking for an extravaganza on the scale
of last month's new iPhone unveiling, chances are you won't find it at
Apple's "Way Too Long" event to be held Thursday in the Town Hall
auditorium at its Cupertino headquarters.
"This will be a very low-key event," Gartner Research Vice President for Mobility Van L. Baker told TechNewsWorld. "They're always low-key when they happen on campus."
While no one knows for sure what Apple has up its sleeve, the
consensus leading up to the event is that it will be refreshing its
tablet and computer lines and releasing the prime-time version of its
desktop operating system, OS X Yosemite. There's an outside chance it
will upgrade its iPod line or Apple TV set top box.
"I don't expect any announcements from the event to be revolutionary," Jeff Orr, senior practice director for mobile devices at ABI Research, told TechNewsWorld. "I'm not expecting any major departures from the iterative process this time around."
What that probably means for the iPad is shaving off a few
millimeters, upgrading to the A8 processor, sporting a new color (gold),
tweaking the display's resolution and reflective qualities, and perhaps
adding fingerprint recognition with TouchID.
iPad Air Pro
There have been rumors of a new larger iPad Air Pro with a 12.9-inch
display, but "I don't think we're going to see a larger iPad," Orr said.
"It's a very small market as it is, and it's an area where Apple would
not be adding distinct capabilities. For a larger iPad, you'd want to
see something more than just a larger screen size."
An iPad Pro would be very much a specialty product, noted Bob O'Donnell, founder and chief analyst at Technalysis Research.
"More and more companies are going to have to make specialized
devices. This large iPad is going to be a good example of that," he told
TechNewsWorld. "In general, it's getting harder and harder for
companies to do general purpose devices that everyone wants. You're
going to start seeing more and more specialization and focus going on
moving forward."
Another driver behind a bigger iPad could be Apple's new good buddy IBM.
"I think, given the IBM deal, which signifies a stronger push into
the enterprise, a larger iPad would be a faster way into the enterprise
than the Mac," Carolina Milanesi, chief of research and head of U.S.
business for Kantar Worldpanel ComTech, told TechNewsWorld.
New 5K iMac?
On the Mac side of things, a new 27-inch iMac with a 5K retina display
could be in the offing, as well as a more powerful MacBook and even a
new Mac mini.
There have been rumors of a refresh of the MacBook Air, which would
add a 12-inch Retina display model and completely reimagine the unit's
design, but those rumors have been losing steam as the event draws
nearer.
While Apple is spreading the footprint of Touch ID, it could decide to add it to its Macs as well.
"A huge portion of online purchases are still made on PCs," O'Donnell explained, "so it might make sense for them to do that."
Possibly making sense doesn't mean it will rise to must-have status, though.
"I do not think Touch ID is as necessary on a Mac as it is on iPhones
and iPads, where speed of access plays a role in the way we use those
devices," Milanesi said.
TouchID could make a Mac a more attractive corporate buy, though.
"It could be interesting as an extra layer of security in the enterprise environment," Milanesi noted.
To go along with the new Mac models, Apple is expected to release OS X
Yosemite, which, among other things, allows Apple users to work on
projects across its mobile and desktop products.
Since the theme of the event is "way too long," two other Apple
products have been connected to Thursday's happening: Apple TV and the
iPod touch.
"Apple TV continues to be enhanced by announcing more partners and
things, but I'm not expecting any significant announcements any time
soon," Baker said.
"The iPod touch is a declining business," he added. "The only
question about iPods is when does it cease to make sense for Apple to be
in that business, because the unit volume keeps going down and down."
New York: The iPhone has taken a big bite out of the BlackBerry in a market where the older phone once dominated: business customers in North America.
Meanwhile, in Europe, Samsung is poised to do the same to Research in Motion, BlackBerry's maker, as a growing number of businesses are buying, or plan to buy, phones using the Android operating system.
Although BlackBerry is a must-have accessory for the growing business class in the developing economies of the world and RIM is adding customers there at a healthy clip, the company faces a problem in its established markets. Businesses are looking for another option besides the BlackBerry.
RIM, Apple and Android phones now equally share the workplace market. In a recent global survey of information workers - people who use a computer or another smart device for at least an hour a day - Forrester Research found that 27 percent of smartphone users said they had an Android phone; 26 percent, a BlackBerry; and 24 percent, an iPhone. "Android and Apple together are eating BlackBerry's lunch," said Frank Gillett, a Forrester analyst.
While some companies are cautious about allowing employees to use Android phones in the office because of security concerns, more businesses that let employees bring their own devices have approved Android devices. Apple's iPhone continues to be popular. Samsung Electronics sold 300 million handsets in 2011, almost all of them Android phones, and became the biggest phone manufacturer in the world. It appears to be in the best position to profit from a shift in the market.
"We've seen quite a huge growth of Android in the enterprise over the last 18 months," said Nick McQuire, research director of enterprise mobility strategies at the International Data Corporation. "We see it as being neck and neck with Apple to be a top mobile enterprise platform in Europe."
RIM's answer to the increasing popularity of Android handsets and the iPhone is a new version of the BlackBerry software, called BlackBerry 10. But phones based on the new software system have been delayed several times and are now not expected until late 2012. Thorsten Heins, the company's new chief executive, said the new software would address the "consumerization of I.T.," referring to the growing trend of businesses letting their employees choose which devices they bring to work.
Mr. Heins believes that RIM's advantage in the business market remains the company's focus on security. He said that RIM regularly speaks to chief information officers, who say they do not like that Android devices and iPhones have become prominent in the work place.
"They are in a pickle. Their pickle is security," Mr. Heins said in an interview. "When the first big security flaw even happens in one of the large enterprises, you will see this turn around. Wait for the day this happens."
But waiting is not something people in businesses are doing. I.D.C. recently surveyed business managers and information technology managers at 728 businesses across seven Western European countries and found that Android was the fastest-growing mobile operating system for business customers in 2011.
Chief information officers at big enterprises said they were not yet formally supporting Android, though all of them have said they had plans to do so in the next 18 months. They are probably hesitating because they need to plan security measures to protect corporate devices, Mr. McQuire said.
Still, the general acceptance of Android in European businesses is a harbinger of RIM's continued struggles. The Tieto Corporation, a European firm that provides information technology services to large companies, said it had seen strong and increasing demand from customers for Android-based business software. Ville Virtanen, an enterprise mobility marketing director at Tieto, said that customers found Android phones to be cheaper and that the software was the least complicated for distributing work-related apps to employees.
And security concerns are being addressed. Some of Samsung's new phones, like the Galaxy S II, include extra security features for enterprise customers. The newest version of Google's Android operating system, called Ice Cream Sandwich, has built-in encryption. In October, Samsung introduced a program called Samsung Approved for Enterprise, which includes a suite of tools tailored specifically for businesses.
Apple's ascendance in the business market with the iPhone and iPad has been especially surprising to many people because the company had shown little interest in catering to the needs of corporate users when it made solely computers. Not long after the iPhone came out in 2007, however, Apple began adding features to the device, like better compatibility with Microsoft's Exchange, a messaging system that is ubiquitous in big companies.
"Once Apple added those capabilities, the floodgates opened," said Mr. Gillett of Forrester. "It was very hard for I.T. to look the C.I.O., C.T.O. and powerful employees in the eye and say, 'You can't use that device.' "
Planet Magpie, a California-based information technology consulting firm, said that employees working for the majority of its 350 clients were using the Apple phone. "A lot of people on BlackBerrys have switched over to the iPhone," said Robert Douglas, president of Planet Magpie. He said that for many businesses, ditching the BlackBerry has actually decreased costs, because companies no longer have to support the BlackBerry enterprise server, RIM's proprietary system designed to protect data on devices. RIM's server, he said, was "always a bit flaky."
RIM also faces practical alternatives to the BlackBerry enterprise server, like Good Technology, an information technology company that provides security and management tools for iOS, Android and RIM devices.
The wild card in the enterprise sweepstakes is the Microsoft Windows smartphone. Nokia, the giant phone maker, has staked its future on the new software, called Windows Phone 7. Information technology managers are comfortable with Microsoft, and the company has deep relationships with most companies.
The big question is whether Microsoft and Nokia will be ready in time to exploit RIM's weakness. Windows Phone 7 is shipping on several new handsets, like Nokia's well-received Lumia 900, and its Windows 8 software for tablets is set to land this year.
Kristen Batch, a spokeswoman for Microsoft, said the company was not ready to announce its plans for business customers.
Waiting is a risk RIM and its new chief executive are willing to take. "I don't want to launch a product that isn't ready," Mr. Heins said. "I want it to be a perfect experience."
Beijing: China's largest electric vehicle (EV) charging and battery swapping station has been put into operation in Beijing, Xinhua reported quoting sources in the city's power supply authorities.
Located in the eastern Beijing's Chaoyang district, the Gaoantun charging station can charge up to eight vehicles simultaneously and it takes only four to six minutes to swap a battery of an EV.
The station has been installed with over 10 types of EV charging or battery swapping machines, covering all charging modes that are available in China.
Beijing is striving to build a new energy vehicle grid as part of the nation's plan to usher in more energy-saving and environmentally-friendly vehicles.
Beijing hopes to build a three-level EV charging and battery swapping network that consists of six large-scale concentrated charging stations, 250 charging and battery swapping stations and 210 small-sized delivery stations by the end of 2015.
So far, the China's capital city has completed construction of 12 charging and battery swapping stations and 274 charging posts.
The city was chosen as one of the 25 pilot cities in China for the utilisation of new-energy vehicles.
China plans to have over 500,000 electric, hybrid and fuel-cell vehicles on the road by 2015 and five million by 2020.
New Delhi: In order to strengthen its position in the Indian television market, Japanese consumer durable maker Sony today introduced a 65 inch LED TV, priced at Rs 3.6 lakh.
"Sony India launches its biggest screen size 65 (165cms) HX925 LED TV in the current line-up of Bravia," the company said in a statement.
The newly introduced product will come along with a skype camera and two pairs of 3D glasses.
"It is available at all Sony Centers and other major electronic outlets across India," the statement said.
Indian televsion market is estimated to be around 17.5 million units, of which LCDs contribute around 4.5 million units.
Sony is among the top players in the Indian television market along with the likes of Korean majors Samsung and LG.
Rival Samsung and LG also currently offers such high-end LED television products in India.
Samsung offers a 60 inch LED TV for Rs 4 lakh, while LG sells a 65 inch TV for Rs 3.99 lakh.
Sony's televisions, which are sold under the Bravia brand, are the biggest revenue generator for the company in India, contributing about 35 per cent to its overall sales that stood at Rs 5,500 crore in last fiscal.
Sony India had last year launched 15 new LED TV models as part of an initiative to register a revenue growth of about 30 per cent to over Rs 7,000 crore this fiscal.
Sony India had said it expected the Indian operations to contribute about 10 per cent of its overall global turnover, up from the current 5 per cent, by 2015. In the fiscal ended March 31, 2011, Sony Corporation had posted revenue of USD 86.521 billion.
Washington: Apple Inc overtook Hewlett-Packard Co as the world's largest vendor of personal computers in the fourth quarter, helped by booming demand for its iPads, research firm Canalys said on Monday.
In the fourth quarter, tablet demand helped drive the global PC market 16 percent higher than a year ago to 120 million computers, Canalys said.
Excluding tablets, the market fell 0.4 percent from a year ago, said Canalys, one of the first research firms to include tablets in PC forecasts. Other firms have said they will likely follow.
London: North Korea has warned its citizens against use of cell phones inside the country, saying anyone caught talking on mobiles would be branded as "war criminals" and punished accordingly, a media report said.
North Korea has long relied on a total restriction of information to maintain control over its isolated citizenry, and in this crucial time of transition between late Kim Jong il and his successor, Kim Jong Un, the state is clamping down on anyone using mobile phones, 'The Daily Telegraph' reported.
This is apparently because of fears of possible discontent among people if they come to know about conditions outside North Korea from any report sent into the country by mobile phones, the report said.
There are also concerns in North Korea that reports about the popular uprisings in the Middle East last year which toppled long-ruling dictators in countries like Tunisia, Libya and Egypt could trigger unrest in the isolated nation.
Moreover, the North Korean regime fears that any outside communication could assist anybody attempting to flee the country to reach South Korea, where an estimated 23,000 defectors have now settled, the report said.
Meanwhile there are reports from within the isolated state that food supplies are again dwindling and that there has been an increase in the number of people attempting to cross the border into China.
The North recently accepted private food aid from the South Korean "Korea Peace Foundation" even as they maintain military exercises and standing threats against their neighbour.